{"id":5372,"date":"2021-06-08T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-08T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/snusforumet.se\/?p=5372"},"modified":"2021-09-16T12:12:44","modified_gmt":"2021-09-16T10:12:44","slug":"snus-and-the-art-of-suppression-part-6-scientists-for-prohibition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/snusforumet.se\/en\/snus-and-the-art-of-suppression-part-6-scientists-for-prohibition\/","title":{"rendered":"Snus and the Art of Suppression: Part 6 – Scientists for prohibition"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Why is snus banned in the European Union? How did it happen? Snusforumet, in partnership with author and commentator Christopher Snowdon, brings you the inside story behind one of the EU’s more confounding policies. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

For the next several weeks, Snusforumet is publishing excerpts from the story behind the EU snus ban<\/em> as written in <\/em>The Art of Suppression: Pleasure, Panic and Prohibition since 1800, a 2011 book written by Christopher Snowdon.<\/em> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, Snusforumet subscribers get instant access to the whole story. Click here to subscribe to Snusforumet<\/a> and get the entire chapter on snus from <\/em>The Art of Suppression emailed straight to your inbox<\/em>. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Part 6 – Scientists for prohibition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While the EU and the Swedish health establishment were going to great lengths to prop up the ban on oral snuff, others saw the prohibition as an accident of history which needed putting right. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

ASH (UK) had been the main driver behind the campaign to ban oral snuff in the 1980s. Twenty years later, they officially acknowledged that the 1985 IARC report that had been used to justify the ban was \u201cbased on studies that were almost exclusively on US and Asian oral tobacco products, not snus.\u201d In June 2004, Clive Bates \u2019successor as director of ASH, Deborah Arnott, called for snus to be legalised and regulated, saying:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cASH believes that there is no logic to the banning of snus, when cigarettes, which are far more deadly, are on general sale.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the same year, a study in the European Journal of Epidemiology estimated that 200,000 lives could be saved if the EU had the same male smoking prevalence as Sweden, which the authors largely attributed to the use of snus. In 2007, the editor of Tobacco Control acknowledged that Sweden\u2019s exceptionally low smoking rate was \u201clargely because of the major shift that has occurred from smoking to snus use in men.\u201d This assertion was supported by numerous studies in the first decade of the twenty-first century.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Around the world, medical authorities with impeccable anti-smoking credentials were endorsing snus as a valid part of tobacco harm reduction. These included…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To continue reading, subscribe to Snusforumet<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t